One we actually rebuilt.
Same practice, same words, rebuilt from scratch.
A two-location independent practice, published anonymously at their request. We checked the site they had, built them a new one, and checked that with the same audit system. The scope and date of each run are stated with the figures.

What actually changes when an eyecare website gets rebuilt?
The practice scored 59 out of 100 before the rebuild. Eight accessibility criteria failed outright, and the accessibility score was zero. Same words, same scanner, after the rebuild: no confirmed accessibility failures, and 6 of 9 key facts about the practice now written where AI can read them.
Book A 30-Minute Call- Scored 59 out of 100 before the rebuild
- 8 accessibility criteria failing, down to 0 confirmed failures in the July 2026 re-check
- Same practice, same words, rebuilt from scratch
- Both checks run by the same scanner in July 2026
Want to see the whole thing? Read a complete sample report (PDF) — every category, every finding, every check that passed, exactly as a practice receives it. The practice name has been removed.
How we verify the work — the method behind every number on this page, including what it does not establish.
Want to see a rebuild rather than read about one? See the before and after — a dated eyecare website we built on purpose and then rebuilt, desktop and phone, side by side. The practice in it is invented, and the page says so.
Scope of these figures. Both checks came from the same audit system in July 2026, which does not by itself mean the two runs covered identical ground. The check on the new site covers six accessibility categories plus tap-target size and the labels search and AI systems read; “no confirmed failures” means nothing failed within that scope on that date — it is not a statement about every criterion, about assistive-technology testing, or about legal compliance. One button on the new site is still slightly smaller than the recommended size, and we name it rather than leave it out. The practice is published anonymously, so its site is described by its measured results rather than shown. How we verify the work.
More on this page’s topic
Is the practice's existing content kept in a rebuild?
Can I see this practice’s site before and after?
Will results like this happen for every practice?
Do you have other practices using this yet?
Could my practice see the same kind of before and after?
The process is identical: we audit the site you have, rebuild it, and audit the new one with the same engine and the same scoring rules. Your numbers depend on your starting point — that is why the audit comes first, free.
Same process, your practice, your content.
Independent practices only · $0 until you’re live · no contract · auto-updated monthly
Free 290+ point audit of your current site.
The same check we run on every site we build. Accessibility, security, AI-search, Google, patient privacy — each item scored on its own. No sales call attached.
Get My Free Audit →Same 290+ point check, on your site
You review the finished site before it ever ships.
There's no risk of an unexpected website change. We build it, professionally review it, and send it to you for approval before anything goes live.
Start My New Website →See your finished site before you decide